HEALTH SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT IN ZAIRE


The concept of primary health care in Zaire predated the 1978 Alma-Ata conference. In 1975 a national seminar organized by the churches, and with full MOH participation, adopted the principles of integrated medicine and proposed the establishment of geographically defined health zones. Based on those principles, a few pilot health zones developed between 1975-1980 as models for the management of decentralized health zones.

The Alma-Ata conference in 1978 firmly established the eight essential components of primary health care and regenerated interest in moving forward with a national strategy for the systems development of health zones in Zaire. Since USAID had been receiving numerous requests from church hospitals for assistance, it was decided to create the Basic Rural Health Project (which became better known as SANRU ) as a "project of projects" to assist 50 rural hospitals in establishing sustainable PHC systems. At the same time, the MOH officially adopted PHC as the national strategy, and announced a five year national health plan to create 300 decentralized health zones.

The SANRU project was initially conceived by USAID as a project to promote primarily family planning. However, a survey of rural hospitals conducted by USAID during the project design phase determined that the need and desire was for a broader project which could provide resources to develop the entire health zone, i.e. a need for systems strengthening assistance. USAID (in particular Richard Thornton who was the health officer at that time) is to be commended for designing the SANRU Basic Rural Health project to emphasize comprehensive rural health programs and health zones. The fact that SANRU was designed shortly after Alma-Ata, but before A.I.D. adopted Child Survival as its selective primary health care approach, provided a "window of opportunity" to experiment with a systems strengthening approach.

The SANRU Basic Rural Health project also became well known as an example of bilateral cooperation (USA and Zaire) which was managed by an umbrella Non-Governmental Organization (the Protestant Church of Zaire). The Protestant Church of Zaire (ECZ) was chosen as the implementing agency because of the strength of their existing medical infrastructure throughout rural Zaire, and because of their pioneering efforts in developing decentralized health districts.

Between 1982 and 1987 the number of functional health zones in Zaire increased dramatically from fewer than ten to over 200 (of the 306 proposed). Access to primary health care services in SANRU-assisted health zones increased from 10% to almost 50%. The creation of autonomously managed health zones not only provided the momentum for implementation of PHC in Zaire, but also made other significant contributions to systems development (see Box 1).(1)

Box 1

HEALTH ZONES AND SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT IN ZAIRE

The health zone is the organizational unit for primary health care in Zaire. A health zone is a well defined geographical area of around 100,000 inhabitants comprising a referral hospital, some 20 satellite health centers and 200 communities (see below for Health Zone Components). The MOH's systems development approach coupled with the resources of the SANRU and PEV (Expanded Program of Immunizations) projects were key elements in the rapid development of health zones. The systems development of health zones also:

  • supplied a unit for "standardizing" health system components while allowing flexibility and autonomy for decentralized planning and management to meet local needs.
  •   
  • provided a population denominator for planning, supervision and reporting within a defined geographical area. This greatly improved the validity of statistical reporting.
  •   
  • achieved a horizontal (technical and administrative) integration of all health interventions.
  •   
  •  improved the equity of health assistance across regions, and decreased duplication of services for the same population by neighboring health zones.
  •   
  • improved donor coordination by tracking which agencies assisted which health zones and/or what kind of assistance one agency was providing across all health zones.
  •   
  • defined an assistance package for "marketing" health zones to development agencies for the design of new health projects.
  •   
  • used the existing infrastructure, programs, and management capacity of NGOs to increase access to PHC and to improve co-management.
  •   
  • improved water & sanitation interventions by improving inter-ministerial coordination.

  


  

However, the worsening economic situation, the AIDS epidemic of the late 1980s, and the increasing political instability of the 1990s, robbed the health system of most of the gains that it was achieving. The August 1991 SANRU evaluation aptly summarizes a best case scenario for the future of health zones in Zaire:

Despite some noble efforts, and numerous survival strategies scenarios, USAID failed to establish an "offshore" funding mechanism for the SANRU project which could continue assistance during the inflationary and political turmoil which culminated in the riots and mass evacuation of September 1991. However, of the 175 health zones which were functional in 1975, some of the NGO-assisted health zones are still considered operational. This, in itself, demonstrates the advantage of a decentralized systems strengthening approach. Keeping the concept of health zone viable in Zaire might be an important contribution of a regional project, and could also serve as a teaching ground for other countries to capture the vision and potential of decentralized health districts.

back to  "A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR SYSTEMS STRENGTHENING"


1. Baer, F.C. SANRU: Lessons Learned (1981-1991), Harrisonburg, VA:BaerTracks. :86 pages, 1992.

2. Tomaro,J. et al. Mid-Term Evaluation of the SANRU Basic Rural Health Project, 1991.